Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Magnetically Driven Intramedullary Limb Lengthening in Patients with Pre-existing Implanted Programmable Devices: A Case Series

Christopher A Iobst, Danielle N Hatfield, Stephen D Forro, Stephen M Quinnan

Keywords : Intramedullary limb lengthening, Limb length discrepancy, Pacemaker.

Citation Information : Iobst CA, Hatfield DN, Forro SD, Quinnan SM. Magnetically Driven Intramedullary Limb Lengthening in Patients with Pre-existing Implanted Programmable Devices: A Case Series. 2023; 18 (2):111-116.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1590

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 26-10-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the use of magnetically controlled intramedullary nails in patient with programmable implantable devices. Background: Magnetically driven intramedullary limb lengthening devices have revolutionised the field of limb reconstruction. Because the system is powered by strong magnets, there are warnings to avoid the use of the device in patients with implanted programmable devices, such as cardiac pacemakers. Materials and methods: Four patients with three different types of programmable implanted devices presented to two centres for limb lengthening and limb reconstruction. Each patient had a limb length discrepancy and desired correction using an intramedullary lengthening device. After thorough counselling about the potential risks and benefits of the procedure as well as discussions with each patient's medical team, the decision to proceed with surgery was made. Results: All four patients underwent osteoplasty with insertion of a magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nail. Goal length was achieved with successful consolidation and subsequent nail removal in all patients. There were no malfunctions of the implantable devices during the distraction phase in any of the patients. Conclusion: With proper precautions, intramedullary lengthening can be performed safely and successfully using a magnetically driven nail in patients with previously implanted programmable devices. Clinical significance: This initial experience suggests use of magnetically controlled intramedullary nails in patient with programmable implantable devices can be undertaken safely within constraints of precautions.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Beinart R, Nazarian S. Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: From engineering principles to clinical practice. Circulation 2013;128(25):2799–2809. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005697.
  2. Iobst CA. Intramedullary limb-lengthening: Lessons learned. JBJS Rev 2019;7(12):e2. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00034.
  3. Peden CJ, Collins AG, Butson PC, et al. Induction of microcurrents in critically ill patients in magnetic resonance systems. Crit Care Med 1993;21(12):1923–1928. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199312000-00021.
  4. Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(7):1315–1324. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.016.
  5. Tan KA, Sewell MD, Clarke AJ, et al. Recommendations for lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods in children with pacemakers. J Pediatr Orthop 2017;37(4):e250–e254. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000872.
  6. Gomez C, Nelson S, Speirs J, et al. Magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails and MRI compatibility. J Pediatr Orthop 2018;38(10):e584–e587. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001236.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.