Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction

Sreenivasulu Metikala, Binu T Kurian, Sanjeev S Madan, James A Fernandes

Keywords : Internal lengthening nail, Limb lengthening, Pelvic support osteotomy,Ilizarov hip reconstruction

Citation Information : Metikala S, Kurian BT, Madan SS, Fernandes JA. Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction. 2020; 15 (2):91-97.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1459

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: Ilizarov hip reconstruction (IHR) is a traditional method of salvaging chronic adolescent problem hips but faces practical problems from external fixators leading to reduced compliance. We present the same reconstruction utilising only internal devices with a modification in technique and aim to review early results. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated eight patients between 2014 and 2017 with chronic painful hips treated by a two-stage reconstruction; stage 1 included femoral head resection and pelvic support osteotomy using double plating, while stage 2 comprised distal femoral osteotomy avoiding varus followed by insertion of retrograde magnetic nail for postoperative lengthening. Patients continued physiotherapy postoperatively while protecting from early weight-bearing. Results: At mean follow-up of 19 months (range 6–36), all osteotomies healed with bone healing index of 47 days/cm (range 30–72). Pain improved from 8.3 (range 7–9) to 2 (range 0–6), while limb length discrepancy got corrected from 4.3 cm (range 3–5) to 1.4 cm (range 0–2.5) at final follow-up. Trendelenburg sign was eliminated in three and delayed in five. No examples of infection or permanent knee stiffness were noted. One patient had plates breakage due to mechanical fall and one had 35 mm of lateral mechanical axis deviation requiring corrective osteotomy. Conclusion: Pelvic support hip reconstruction with exclusive internal devices is a technique in evolution with encouraging early results. It avoids common complications of external fixators and facilitates quick rehabilitation of joints. Refraining from distal varus can effectively eliminate Trendelenburg gait, albeit with some degree of lateral mechanical axis deviation. Unlike external fixation where there is a possibility of gradual correction, this staged procedure of internal fixation is technically demanding with a learning curve. Clinical significance: Pelvic support hip reconstruction performed by internal implants is a viable alternative to IHR with potential benefits.


PDF Share
  1. Rozbruch SR, Paley D, Bhave A, et al. Ilizarov hip reconstruction for the late sequelae of infantile hip infection. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2005;87(5):1007–1018. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200505000-00011.
  2. Pafilas D, Nayagam S. The pelvic support osteotomy: Indications and preoperative planning. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 2008;3(2):83–92. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-008-0039-7.
  3. Ilizarov GA. Hip dislocations. Transosseous Osteosynthesis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1992. pp. 701–726.
  4. Paley D, Paley D. Hip joint considerations. Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002. pp. 647–694.
  5. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, et al. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79(10):1464–1480. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199710000-00003.
  6. Samchukov ML, Cherkashin AM, Birch JG. Pelvic support osteotomy and limb reconstruction for septic destruction of the hip. Oper Tech Orthop 2013;23(3):158–166. DOI: 10.1053/j.oto.2013.07.009.
  7. El-Mowafi H. Outcome of pelvic support osteotomy with the Ilizarov method in the treatment of the unstable hip joint. Acta Orthop Belg 2005;71(6):686–691.
  8. Mahran MA, ElGebeily MA, Ghaly NAM, et al. Pelvic support osteotomy by Ilizarov's concept: is it a valuable option in managing neglected hip problems in adolescents and young adults? Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 2011;6(1):13–20. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-011-0104-5.
  9. Samchukov ML, Birch JG. Pelvic support femoral reconstruction using the method of Ilizarov: a case report. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1992;52(1):7–11.
  10. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990(250):81–104. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199001000-00011.
  11. Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Retrograde magnetic internal lengthening nail for acute femoral deformity correction and limb lengthening. Expert Rev Med Devices 2017;14(10):811–820. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1378092.
  12. Kirane YM, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Precision of the PRECICE® internal bone lengthening nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472(12):3869–3878. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3575-0.
  13. Milch H. The resection-angulation operation for hip-joint disabilities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955;37(4):699–717. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-195537040-00004.
  14. Moras P, Belthur MV, Jones SJFJ. Pelvic support osteotomy - Revisited. Orthop Proc 2006;88-B(SUPP_III):436.
  15. Nunn TR, Pratt E, Dickens W, et al. Ilizarov hip reconstruction for the adolescent difficult problem hip. Orthop Proc 2013;95(SUPP_23):24.
  16. Hasler CC, Krieg AH. Current concepts of leg lengthening. J Child Orthop 2012;6(2):89–104. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0391-5.
  17. Green SA. Complications of external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983(180):109–116. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198311000-00015.
  18. Singh S, Lahiri A, Iqbal M. The results of limb lengthening by callus distraction using an extending intramedullary nail (Fitbone) in non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(7):938–942. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17618.
  19. Krieg AH, Speth BM, Foster BK. Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents an alternative to external fixators? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466(1):189–197. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0040-3.
  20. Baumgart R, Betz A, Schweiberer L. A fully implantable motorized intramedullary nail for limb lengthening and bone transport. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;343:135–143. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199710000-00023.
  21. Laubscher M, Mitchell C, Timms A, et al. Outcomes following femoral lengthening: an initial comparison of the precice intramedullary lengthening nail and the LRS external fixator monorail system. Bone Jt J 2016;98-B(10):1382–1388. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10. 36643.
  22. Barker KL, Simpson AH, Lamb SE. Loss of knee range of motion in leg lengthening. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001;31(5):238–244. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.5.238discussion 245-6.
  23. Glorion C, Pouliquen JC, Langlais J, et al. Femoral lengthening using the callotasis method: study of the complications in a series of 70 cases in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 16(2):161–167. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199603000-00005.
  24. Hogan KA, Blake M, Gross RH. Subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy for chronically dislocated, painful spastic hips. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 2006;88(12):2624–2631. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200612000- 00009.
  25. Aksoy MC, Musdal Y. Subtrochanteric valgus-extension osteotomy for neglected congenital dislocation of the hip in young adults. Acta Orthop Belg 2000;66(2):181–186.
  26. Krieg AH, Lenze U, Hasler CC. Ilizarov hip reconstruction without external fixation: a new technique. J Child Orthop 2010;4(3):259–266. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-010-0256-8.
  27. Reynders-Frederix P, Reynders-Frederix C, Wajid M. Pelvic support osteotomy; salvage procedure in chronically dislocated hips case report: technical note on the on-lay bone positioning of a lengthening nail and review of the literature. Open Orthop J 2016;10(1):232–240. DOI: 10.2174/1874325001610010232.
  28. Maffulli N, Nele U, Matarazzo L. Changes in knee motion following femoral and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov apparatus: a cohort study. J Orthop Sci 2001;6(4):333–338. DOI: 10.1007/s007760100028.
  29. Milch H. Surgical treatment of the stiff, painful hip--the resection-angulation operation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1963;31(1):48–57. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-196300310-00007.
  30. Brand RA. 50 Years ago in CORR: technic of the resection-angulation operation for hip-joint disabilities. henry milch MD CORR;13:265-270. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(2):628–630. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1155-5.
  31. Bailey R, Selfe J, Richards J. The role of the Trendelenburg test in the examination of gait. Phys Ther Rev 2009;14(3):190–197. DOI: 10.1179/174328809X452836.
  32. Hardcastle P, Nade S. The significance of the Trendelenburg test. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985;67(5):741–746. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.67B5.4055873.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.