A dynamic hip screw (DHS) remains the implant of choice for stabilization of trochanteric fractures because of its favourable results and low rate of non-union or hardware failure, but complication rates of the DHS are higher in unstable and osteoporotic trochanteric fractures. The proponents of the dynamic helical hip system (DHHS) report that it has the potential to decrease the cut-out rates in such fractures as helical blade allows compaction in osteoporotic femoral head which in itself improves anchorage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the radiological and functional outcome of DHHS in unstable and osteoporotic trochanteric fractures. This was a prospective observational study. The mean age of the 51 patients (24 men and 27 women) was 72.8 years. Fractures were type AO31A2.2 in 28 patients and AO31A2.3 in 23 patients. According to DEXA scans, 41 patients had osteoporosis and 10 patients had osteopenia. Osteoporosis was grade 3 in 36 patients and grade 2 in 15 patients according to Singh's index. The mean follow-up was 1.84 years. The average sliding of the lag screw was 3.6 mm (range 2–10 mm). The mean operative time was 54.74 (range 48–65) min. The average tip–apex distance was 20.24 mm (range 12–28 mm). All but one fractures united. The average time to union was 13.14 (range 11–24) weeks. There were four mechanical complications namely late helical blade migration (n = 1), late medialization of shaft (n = 2) and varus collapse with cut through (n = 1). No patient was noted to have a plate pull-out. The average Harris hip score was 92.87 (range 76–97). The use of a DHHS for stabilization of unstable(AO31A2), osteoporotic trochanteric fractures in the elderly patients was associated with reliable rates of union and functional outcome and a decreased incidence of screw cut-out and side plate pull-out.
Cleveland H, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR (1947) Interpertrochanteric fractures of the femur; a survey of treatment in traction and by internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 29:1049-1067
Rao JP, Banzon MT, Weiss AB, Rayhack J (1983) Treatment of unstable interpertrochanteric fractures with anatomic reduction and compression hip screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 175:65-71
Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, Fabeck L, Smets P, Bertens CL et al (1998) Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for interpertrochanteric femoral fractures: a prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:618-630
Adams CL, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2001) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for interpertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 15:394-400
Schipper IB, Marti RK, van der Werken C (2004) Unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures: extramedullary or intramedullary fixation. Review of literature. Injury 35:142-151
Nordin S, Zulkifli O, Faisham WI (2001) Mechanical failure of Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation in interpertrochanteric fracture of the femur. Med J Malaysia 56(D):12-17
Simpson AH, Varty K, Dodd CA (1989) Sliding hip screws: modes of failure. Injury 20(4):227-231
Buciuto R, Uhlin B, Hammerby S, Hammer R (1998) RAB-plate versus Richards CHS plate for unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. A randomized study of 233 patients with 1-year followup. Acta Orthop Scand 69:25-28
Jewell DPA, Gheduzzi S, Mitchell MS, Miles AW (2008) Locking plates increase the strength of the dynamic hip screws. Injury 39:209-212
Stern R (2007) Are there advances in the treatment of extracapsular hip fractures in the elderly? Injury 38(3):S77-S87
Laohapoonrungsee A, Arpornchayanon O, Phornputkal C (2005) Two hole side plate DHS in the treatment of inter-pertrochanteric fracture: results and complications. Injury 36:1355-1360
Wolfgang GL, Bryant MH, O'Neil JP (1982) Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:148-158
Stromsoe K (2004) Fracture fixation problems in osteoporosis. Injury 35:107-113
Gardner MJ, Briggs SM, Kopjar B, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2007) Radiographic outcomes of interpertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the pertrochanteric fixation nail. Injury 38: 1189-1196
Strauss E, Frank J, Lee J, Kummer FJ, Tejwani N (2006) Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable interpertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. Injury 37:984-989
Wahnert D, Gudushauri P, Schiuma D, Richards G, Windolf M (2010) Does cancellous bone compaction due to insertion of a blade implant influence the cut-out resistance? A biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:1053-1057
Windolf M, Muths R, Braunstein V, Gueorguiev B, Hänni M, Schwieger K (2009) Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS Blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24(1):53-58
Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:457-467
Ahmad AM, Xypnitos NF, Giannoudis PV (2011) Measuring hip outcomes: common scales and checklists. Injury 42:259-264
Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M (2002) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric femoral fracture. Injury 33:395-399
Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C, Greenwood R, Harries WJ, Chesser TJ (2010) A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:792-798
Banan H, Al-Sabti A, Jimulia T, Hart AJ (2002) The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN)-our first 60 cases. Injury 33:401-405
Luo XP, He SQ, Li ZA (2011) Case control studies on locking plates and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of interpertrochanteric hip fractures. Zhongguo Gu Shang 24:242-244
Lavini F, Renzi-Brivio L, Aulisa R, Cherubino F, Di Seglio PL, Galante N et al (2008) The treatment of stable and unstable proximal femoral fractures with a new pertrochanteric nail: results of a multicentre study with the Veronail. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 3(1):15-22
Karn NK, Singh GK, Kumar P, Shrestha B, Singh MP, Gowda MJ (2006) Comparison between external fixation and the sliding hip screw in the management of pertrochanteric fracture of femur in Nepal. J Bone Joint Surg 88:1347-1350
Sommers MB, Roth C, Hall H, Kam BC, Ehmke LW, Krieg JC et al (2004) A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for perpertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18(6):361-368
Windolf M, Braunstein V, Dutoit C, Schwieger K (2009) Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24(1):59-64
Jacobs RR, McClain O, Armstrong HJ (1980) Internal fixation of interpertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146:62-70
Fitzpatrick DC, Sheerin DV, Wolf BR, Wuest TK (2011) A randomized, prospective study comparing interpertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with dynamic hip screw and dynamic helical hip system in a community practice. Iowa Orthop J 31:166-172
