Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( April, 2013 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint

Jens Christian Werlinrud, Kirstin Petersen, Jens Lauritsen, Søren Larsen, Henrik Schrøder

Keywords : Conservative versus surgical intervention, Hyperextension injury, Palmar ligament, PIP, Prospective randomized study, Proximal interphalangeal joint, Palmar fibrocartilage, Palmar plate

Citation Information : Werlinrud JC, Petersen K, Lauritsen J, Larsen S, Schrøder H. A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint. 2013; 8 (1):21-24.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-013-0154-y

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of conservative versus operative treatment for unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the fingers with respect to preservation of joint stability, mobility, and pain. The study was conducted as a prospective study in which 83 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1) conservative treatment with a rigid splint for 2 weeks, (2) surgical reattachment of the palmar plate in local anesthesia followed by 2 weeks of immobilization in a plaster cast. Both groups were thereafter treated by taping to the neighboring finger for 3 weeks. With regard to hyperextension instability, stiffness, and pain, there is no significant difference in outcome between patients with traumatic palmar plate lesions and hyperextension instability treated with surgical repair and patients treated conservatively with a splint. We do not recommend primary surgical repair of unstable isolated palmar plate lesions in the proximal interphalangeal joints of the 4 ulnar fingers. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic, Level II.


PDF Share
  1. Hocker K, Menschik A (1992) Injury of the palmar fibrocartilage of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the long finger. Treatment and results within the scope of follow-up. Unfallchirurg 95(7):344-348
  2. Jespersen B, Nielsen NS, Bonnevie BE, Boeckstyns ME (1998) Hyperextension injury to the PIP joint or to the MP joint of the thumb—a clinical study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 32(3):317-321
  3. Moller JT (1974) Lesions of the volar fibrocartilago in finger joints. A 2-year material. Acta Orthop Scand 45(5):673-682
  4. Orthner E, Kwasny W, Schabus R (1987) Results of the conservative treatment of injuries of the palmar capsule-ligament system of the interphalangeal joints of the long fingers. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 19(5):263-268
  5. Accident analysis group. (2009)
  6. Incavo SJ, Mogan JV, Hilfrank BC (1989) Extension splinting of palmar plate avulsion injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am] 14(4):659-661
  7. Bowers WH, Wolf JW Jr, Nehil JL, Bittinger S (1980) The proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate. I. An anatomical and biomechanical study. J Hand Surg [Am] 5(1):79-88
  8. Hintringer W, Leixnering M (1991) Osseous or ligamentous injuries of the phalango-interphalangeal joint and their treatment. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 23(2):59-66
  9. Leibovic SJ, Bowers WH (1994) Anatomy of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin 10(2):169-178
  10. Bowers WH (1981) The proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate. II: a clinical study of hyperextension injury. J Hand Surg [Am] 6(1):77-81
  11. Thomsen NO, Petersen MS, Hovgaard C (1995) Treatment of hyperextension injuries to the PIP joint. J Hand Surg [Br] 20(3): 383-384
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.