Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 ( November, 2017 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Accuracy in identifying the elbow rotation axis on simulated fluoroscopic images using a new anatomical landmark

J. K. Wiggers, R. M. Snijders, J. G. G. Dobbe, G. J. Streekstra, D. den Hartog, N. W. L. Schep

Keywords : Fluoroscopy, Elbow, Rotation axis, Landmark, Segmentation

Citation Information : Wiggers JK, Snijders RM, Dobbe JG, Streekstra GJ, den Hartog D, Schep NW. Accuracy in identifying the elbow rotation axis on simulated fluoroscopic images using a new anatomical landmark. 2017; 12 (3):133-139.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-017-0289-3

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 30-11-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

External fixation of the elbow requires identification of the elbow rotation axis, but the accuracy of traditional landmarks (capitellum and trochlea) on fluoroscopy is limited. The relative distance (RD) of the humerus may be helpful as additional landmark. The first aim of this study was to determine the optimal RD that corresponds to an on-axis lateral image of the elbow. The second aim was to assess whether the use of the optimal RD improves the surgical accuracy to identify the elbow rotation axis on fluoroscopy. CT scans of elbows from five volunteers were used to simulate fluoroscopy; the actual rotation axis was calculated with CT-based flexion–extension analysis. First, three observers measured the optimal RD on simulated fluoroscopy. The RD is defined as the distance between the dorsal part of the humerus and the projection of the posteromedial cortex of the distal humerus, divided by the anteroposterior diameter of the humerus. Second, eight trauma surgeons assessed the elbow rotation axis on simulated fluoroscopy. In a preteaching session, surgeons used traditional landmarks. The surgeons were then instructed how to use the optimal RD as additional landmark in a postteaching session. The deviation from the actual rotation axis was expressed as rotational and translational error (±SD). Measurement of the RD was robust and easily reproducible; the optimal RD was 45%. The surgeons identified the elbow rotation axis with a mean rotational error decreasing from 7.6° ± 3.4° to 6.7° ± 3.3° after teaching how to use the RD. The mean translational error decreased from 4.2 ± 2.0 to 3.7 ± 2.0 mm after teaching. The humeral RD as additional landmark yielded small but relevant improvements. Although fluoroscopy-based external fixator alignment to the elbow remains prone to error, it is recommended to use the RD as additional landmark.


PDF Share
  1. Ring D, Hannouche D, Jupiter JB (2004) Surgical treatment of persistent dislocation or subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint after fracture-dislocation of the elbow. J Hand Surg 29(3):470-480
  2. Schep NW, De Haan J, Iordens GI et al (2011) A hinged external fixator for complex elbow dislocations: a multicenter prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:130
  3. McKee MD, Bowden SH, King GJ et al (1998) Management of recurrent, complex instability of the elbow with a hinged external fixator. J Bone Joint Surg 80(6):1031-1036
  4. Sorensen AK, Sojbjerg JO (2011) Treatment of persistent instability after posterior fracture-dislocation of the elbow: restoring stability and mobility by internal fixation and hinged external fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(8):1300-1309
  5. Ouyang Y, Liao Y, Liu Z, Fan C (2013) Hinged external fixator and open surgery for severe elbow stiffness with distal humeral nonunion. Orthopedics 36(2):e186-e192
  6. Iordens GI, Den Hartog D, Van Lieshout EM et al (2015) Good functional recovery of complex elbow dislocations treated with hinged external fixation: a multicenter prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(4):1451-1461
  7. Cheung EV, O'Driscoll SW, Morrey BF (2008) Complications of hinged external fixators of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(3):447-453
  8. Madey SM, Bottlang M, Steyers CM, Marsh JL, Brown TD (2000) Hinged external fixation of the elbow: optimal axis alignment to minimize motion resistance. J Orthop Trauma 14(1):41-47
  9. Chen NC, Julka A (2010) Hinged external fixation of the elbow. Hand Clin 26(3):423-433
  10. Wiggers JK, Streekstra GJ, Kloen P, Mader K, Goslings JC, Schep NW (2014) Surgical accuracy in identifying the elbow rotation axis on fluoroscopic images. J Hand Surg 39(6):1141-1145
  11. Bottlang M, O'Rourke MR, Madey SM, Steyers CM, Marsh JL, Brown TD (2000) Radiographic determinants of the elbow rotation axis: experimental identification and quantitative validation. J Orthop Res 18(5):821-828
  12. Adikrishna A, Kekatpure AL, Tan J, Lee HJ, Deslivia MF, Jeon IH (2014) Vortical flow in human elbow joints: a three-dimensional computed tomography modeling study. J Anat 225(4):390-394
  13. Dobbe JG, Strackee SD, Schreurs AW et al (2011) Computerassisted planning and navigation for corrective distal radius osteotomy, based on pre- and intraoperative imaging. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 58(1):182-190
  14. Peacock J, Peacock PJ (2011) Oxford handbook of medical statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  15. Everitt BS (2005) Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Wiley, Hoboken
  16. Victor J (2009) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(5):365-372
  17. Sabo MT, Athwal GS, King GJ (2012) Landmarks for rotational alignment of the humeral component during elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 94(19):1794-1800
  18. Bigazzi P, Biondi M, Corvi A, Pfanner S, Checcucci G, Ceruso M (2015) A new autocentering hinged external fixator of the elbow: a device that stabilizes the elbow axis without use of the articular pin. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(8):1197-1205
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.