Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  18 (2023)
Volume  17 (2022)
Volume  16 (2021)
Volume  15 (2020)
Volume  14 (2019)
Volume  13 (2018)
Volume  12 (2017)
Volume  11 (2016)
Volume  10 (2015)
Volume  9 (2014)
Volume  8 (2013)
Volume  7 (2012)
Volume  6 (2011)
Volume  5 (2010)
Volume  4 (2009)
Volume  3 (2008)
Volume  2 (2007)
Volume  1 (2006)
Related articles

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 1 ( April, 2016 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Intramedullary nailing versus external fixation in Gustilo type III open tibial shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Francesca Giovannini, Luigi de Palma, Andrea Panfighi, Mario Marinelli

Keywords : External fixation, Intramedullary nailing, Open tibia fractures

Citation Information : Giovannini F, de Palma L, Panfighi A, Marinelli M. Intramedullary nailing versus external fixation in Gustilo type III open tibial shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. 2016; 11 (1):1-4.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-016-0245-7

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

Open tibial shaft fractures are the most common of long-bone open fractures. Management of the fracture is either by intramedullary nailing (IMN) or by external fixation (EF). Since the literature does not indicate clearly which is more effective, a meta-analysis was conducted to establish which approach is more suitable to treat Gustilo type III fractures. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) describing IMN and EF treatment of Gustilo type III fractures. As of 15 November 2012, five RCT involving 239 patients had been published; the outcomes examined in this study are their surgical complications. Data analysis led complications to be grouped into infection, fracture healing problems (non-union, malunion) and “other complications” (vascular injury, revision surgery, soft tissue damage, mechanical failure and tibial malalignment). IMN was associated with lower rates of infection and fracture healing problems; the differences between the two approaches for “other complications” were not significant. The data indicate that IMN is the treatment of choice for Gustilo type III fractures.

PDF Share
  1. Watson JT, Wiss DA (2001) Rockwood and Green's Fractures in adults. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers (ed) Fractures of the proximal tibia and fibula, vol 2 cap. 44, pp 996-1015
  2. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J (1995) The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 77B:417-421
  3. Gustilo et al. (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of thousand and twenty five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(4):453-458
  4. Anderson JB, Gustilo RB (1980) Immediate internal fixation in open fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 11(3):569-578
  5. Kohlprath R, Assal M, Uçkay I, Holzer N, Hoffmeier P, Suva D (2011) Open fractures of the tibia in the adult: surgical treatment and complication. Rev Med Suisse 7(322):2482-2484-8
  6. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN (1984) Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma 24(8):742-746
  7. Gustilo RB, Gruninger RP, Davis T (1987) Classification of type III (severe) open fractures relative to treatment and results. Orthopedics 10(12):1781-1788
  8. Holbrook JL, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders R (1989) Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: ender nailing versus external fixation. A randomized, prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(8):1231-1238
  9. Tornetta P, Bergman M, Watnik N, Berkowitz G, Stever J (1994) Treatment of grace IIIB open tibial fractures. A prospective randomized comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(1):13-19
  10. Tu YK, Lin CH, Su JI, Hsu DT, Chen RJ (1995) Unreamed interlocking nail versus external fixator for open tipe III tibia fractures. J Trauma 39(2):361-367
  11. Inan M, Halici M, Ayan I, Tuncel M, Karaoglu S (2007) Treatment of type IIIA open fractures of tibial shaft with Ilizarov external fixator versus undreamed tibial nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(8):617-623
  12. Mohseni MA, Soleimanpour J, Mohammadpour H, Shahsavari A (2011) AO tubular external fixation vs unreamed intramedullary nailing in open grade IIIA-IIIB tibial shaft fractures: a single center clinical trial. Pak J Biol Sci 14(8):490-495
  13. Koval KJ, Clapper MF, Brumback RJ, Stribling Ellison P, Poka A, Bathon H et al (1991) Complication of reamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Orthop Trauma 5:184-189
  14. Blachut PA, Meek RN, O'Brien PJ (1990) External fixation and delayed intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the tibial shaft. J Bone J Surg 72:729-775
  15. Court-Brown CM, Keating JF, McQueen MM (1992) Infection after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Bone J Surg 74(B):770-774
  16. Fang X, Jiang L, Wang Y, Zhao L (2012) Treatment of Gustilo grade III tibial fractures with unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixator: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit 18(4):RA49-RA56
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.