The subtrochanteric region has certain anatomical and biomechanical features that can make fractures in this region difficult for the treating surgeon. The preferred type of device is a matter of debate. Increased understanding of mechanical characteristics of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) has reduced the incidence of complications. Our hypothesis is based on the technical optimization of the DHS application. We prospectively studied 37 patients with subtrochanteric fractures with a mean age of 42.9 years. We utilized a two-stage protocol: initially, conversion of the comminuted fractures into two part fractures; then application of the implant with a technique that allowed dynamization of the DHS. Clinical and radiographic data were used to assess the outcome at 12 months. Fracture healing was obtained for all cases in a mean time of 11.64 weeks. One patient had 1.5 cm shortening of the injured limb. No implant failure was reported. All patients resumed pre-injury activities of daily living. It was concluded that the patients who were treated with the technical optimization of the DHS application achieved a close-to-normal anatomy following surgery and maintained this state throughout the follow-up period.
Kyle RF (1994) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:924-950
Seinsheimer F (1978) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60A:300-306
Lavelle David G (2003) Campbell's operative orthopaedics, 10th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, p 2897
Lunsjö K, Ceder L, Tidermark J et al (1999) Extramedullary fixation of 107 subtrochanteric fractures: A randomized multicenter trial of the Medoff sliding plate versus 3 other screw-plate systems. Acta Orthop Scand 70(5):459-466
Parker MJ (1996) Trochanteric hip fractures. Fixation failure commoner with femoral medialization, a comparison of 101 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 67(4):329-332
Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Ahlo A, Ekeland A, Strømsøe K (1998) Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12(4):241-248
Miedel R, Ponzer S, Törnkvist H et al (2005) The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 87-B:68-75
Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, Jackson B, Jaffe M (1963) Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychological function. JAMA 185:94-99
Pajarinen J, Lindahl J et al (2005) Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 87B:76-81
DeLee JC (1996) Subtrochanteric fracture. In: Rockwood and Green's fracture in adults, chap 26, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, USA
Waddell JP (1979) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: a review of 130 patients. J Trauma 19:582-592
Davis PH, Frymoyer JW (1969) The lateral position in the surgical management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:1128-1134
Wile PB, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO (1983) Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures with a high-angle compression hip screw. Clin Orthop 175:72
Habernek H, Schmid L, Frauenschuh E (2000) Sport related proximal femoral fractures: a retrospective review of 31 cases treated in an eight year period. Br J Sports Med 34:54-58
Parker MJ, Dutta BK, Sivaji C, Pryor GA (1997) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Injury 28(2):91-95
