Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( April, 2008 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

The treatment of stable and unstable proximal femoral fractures with a new trochanteric nail: results of a multicentre study with the Veronail

F. Lavini, L. Renzi-Brivio, R. Aulisa, F. Cherubino, P. L. Di Seglio, N. Galante, W. Leonardi, M. Manca

Keywords : Multi-center clinical trail, Outcome study, Hip fractures, Intramedullary nail, Sliding parallel screws

Citation Information : Lavini F, Renzi-Brivio L, Aulisa R, Cherubino F, Di Seglio PL, Galante N, Leonardi W, Manca M. The treatment of stable and unstable proximal femoral fractures with a new trochanteric nail: results of a multicentre study with the Veronail. 2008; 3 (1):15-22.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-008-0035-y

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2008; The Author(s).


Abstract

The incidence of hip fractures continues to rise. This study is the first evaluation of a new intramedullary implant, the Veronail, that provides double axis fixation into the femoral head and allows the surgeon to choose whether to use sliding or fixed locked proximal screw fixation for trochanteric femoral fractures. The fractures were classified according to the AO classification, and function was assessed with the Modified Harris Hip Score. 111 patients with trochanteric fractures were evaluated in eight Italian hospitals. The stable 31.A1 fractures were treated with sliding proximal screws, the subtrochanteric 31.A3 fractures with converging proximal screws, and the unstable 31.A2 fractures were treated with both types of proximal fixation. The unstable fractures treated with locked converging screws had the same function at one year as those treated with sliding screws. This study suggests a possible new method of treating unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. This may be the solution to prevent excessive collapse of the fracture with the resultant poor function and persisting pain noted in the literature. Two converging locked proximal screws seem to provide stable fixation in 31.A2 femoral fractures and produce as good a result as the use of traditional sliding screws. The role of converging locked proximal screws in unstable trochanteric fractures requires further evaluation.


PDF Share
  1. AAOS Bulletin (2005) vol 53, No. 6
  2. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2001) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic hip screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 15:394-400
  3. Ahrengart L, Tornkvist H, Fornander P et al (2002) A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 401:209-222
  4. Baixauli F, Vicenti V, Baixauli E et al (1999) A reinforced rigid fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop 361:205-215
  5. Bendo JA, Weiner LS, Strauss E, Yang E (1994) Collapse of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed with sliding screws. Orthop Rev Aug (Suppl):30-37
  6. Bolhofner BR, Russo PR, Carmen B (1999) Results of intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with a 135-degree sliding screw with a two-hole side plate. J Orthop Trauma 13(1):5-8
  7. Broos PL, Stappaerts KH, Luiten EJ, Gruwez JA (1988) Homegoing: prognostic factors concerning the major goal in treatment of elderly hip fracture-patients. Int Surg 73(3):148-150
  8. Chinoy MA, Parker MJ (1999) Fixed nail plates versus sliding hip systems for the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures: a meta analysis of 14 studies. Injury 30(2):157-163
  9. Chirodian N, Arch B, Parker M (2005) Sliding hip screw fixation of trochanteric hip fractures: outcome of 1024 procedures. Injury 36:793-800
  10. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285-289
  11. Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Taylor BC et al (2007) Frailty and risk of falls, fracture, and mortality in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Gerontol 62A(7):744-751
  12. Esser MP, Kassab JY, Jones DHA (1986) Trochanteric fractures of the femur: a randomised prospective trial comparing the Jewett nail-plate with the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 68B(4):557-560
  13. Gullberg B, Duppe H, Nilsson B et al (1993) Incidence of hip fractures in Malmö, Sweden (1950-1991). Bone 14(Suppl 1):23-29
  14. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An endresult study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737-755
  15. Heyse-Moore GH, Maceachern AG, Jameson Evans DC (1983) Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: a comparison of the Richards screw-plate with the Jewett nail-plate. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 65(3):262-267
  16. Jacobs RR, McClain O, Armstrong HJ (1980) Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study. Clin Orthop 146:62-70
  17. Kannus P, Oarkkari J, Sievänen H et al (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 18(Suppl 1):57-63
  18. Kim WY, Han C-H, Park J-I, Kim JY (2001) Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre-operative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop 25(6):360-362
  19. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD (2001) Intertrochanteric fractures. In: Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults, 5th edn, vol 2, pp 1635-1663
  20. Lauritzen JB (1996) Hip fractures: incidence, risk factors, energy absorption, and prevention. Bone 18(1 Suppl):65S-75S
  21. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW (1992) Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(3):345-351
  22. Miedel R, Ponzer S, Törnkvist H et al (2005) The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(1):68-75
  23. Pajarinen J., Lindahl J, Michelsson O et al (2005) Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(1):76-81
  24. Parker MJ, Handoll HHG (2000) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane library, vol 4, Oxford, update software
  25. Sadowski C, Lübbeke A, Saudan M et al (2002) Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A(3): 372-381
  26. Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C et al (2002) Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail? A randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma 16(6):386-393
  27. Schipper IB, Marti RK, van der Werken C (2004) Unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: extramedullary or intramedullary fixation. Review of literature. Injury 35(2):142-151
  28. Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM et al (2004) Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the Gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(1):86-94
  29. Simmermacher RKJ, Bosch AM, Van der Werken Chr (1999) The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 30:327-332
  30. Stappaerts KH, Deldycke J, Broos et al (1995) Treatment of unstable peritrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with a compression hip screw or with the Vandeputte (VDP) endoprosthesis: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Trauma 9(4):292-297
  31. Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Muñoz FN et al (2005) Gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the Gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 19:229-233
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.