Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( November, 2018 ) > List of Articles

TECHNICAL REPORT

Two consecutive limb lengthenings with the same PRECICE nail: a technical note

Nuno Alegrete

Keywords : Limb, Lengthening, Magnetic, Nail, Deformity

Citation Information : Alegrete N. Two consecutive limb lengthenings with the same PRECICE nail: a technical note. 2018; 13 (3):199-204.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-018-0317-y

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 30-11-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose The most significant advance in our time about limb lengthening is the magnetic lengthening nail, as the first reports appeared to show good results with accurate lengthening rates and good regenerate bone formation. The described complication rate is generally low. They avoid external fixation elements, and are activated transcutaneously, so the patient\'s pain and discomfort are reduced and the rehabilitation is faster and more effective. The aim of authors is to describe a special technical issue of the PRECICE system: the nail can be extended inside the patient limb (after the osteotomy), but it also can be retracted inside the limb after achieving the bone union. Methods The authors present a case in which the limb lengthening has been performed in consecutive lengthening periods using the same nail. The nail was extended and retracted by altering the settings on the external remote control as well as accurately setting the rate of distraction. Results After two consecutive femoral lengthening with the same PRECICE nail, the patient no longer has a significant lower limb length discrepancy and patient satisfaction was high. During this clinical case, we were not confronted with any type of complications. Conclusion This technique utilizes the principles and advantages of lengthening over an magnetic lengthening nail, avoids the necessity of nail removal and minimizes the complication rates and the overall time for complete recovery. Level of evidence Level IV.


PDF Share
  1. Birch J (2017) A brief history of limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop 37(Suppl 2):S1-S8
  2. Calder P et al (2017) The role of the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening. Injury 48(Suppl 1):S52-S58
  3. Calder P, McGrath A, Chasseaud M, Timms A, Goodier W (2013) The precice intramedullary limb lengthening system. Bone Joint J 95-B(Suppl. 23):11
  4. Kirane YM, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2014) Precision of the PRECICE internal bone lengthening nail. Clin Orthop 472:3869
  5. Laubscher M, Mitchell C, Timms A, Goodier D, Calder P (2016) Outcomes following femoral lengthening: an initial comparison of the precice intramedullary lengthening nail and the LRS external fixator monorail system. Bone Joint J 98-B(10):1382-1388
  6. Paley D (2015) Precice intramedullary limb lengthening system. Expert Rev Med Devices 12(3):231
  7. Paley D, Harris M, Debiparshad K, Prince D (2014) Limb lengthening by implantable lengthening devices. Tech Orthop 29:72
  8. Pejin Z (2017) Femoral lengthening in children and adolescents. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(1S):S143-S149
  9. Schiedel F, Vogt B, Tretow HL, Schuhknecht B, Gosheger Horter M et al (2014) How precise is the PRECICE compared to the ISKD in intra-medullary limb lengthening? Acta Orthop 85:293
  10. Xu WG (2017) Comparison of intramedullary nail versus conventional Ilizarov method for lower limb lengthening: a systematic review and meta analysis. Orthop Surg 9:159-166
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.