Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( November, 2018 ) > List of Articles

Review

Uniting the un-united: should established non-unions of femoral shaft fractures initially treated with IM nails be treated by plate augmentation instead of exchange IM nailing? A systematic review

Gareth Medlock, Iain M. Stevenson, Alan J. Johnstone

Keywords : Femoral non-union, Femoral fracture, Intramedullary nailing, Adjunctive plating

Citation Information : Medlock G, Stevenson IM, Johnstone AJ. Uniting the un-united: should established non-unions of femoral shaft fractures initially treated with IM nails be treated by plate augmentation instead of exchange IM nailing? A systematic review. 2018; 13 (3):119-128.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-018-0323-0

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 30-11-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

The majority of femoral fractures are surgically treated with intramedullary nails. Non-union rate is low but challenging and costly if it occurs. There have been encouraging results from the use of augmentative plating as a treatment for non-union of femoral fractures. We performed a systematic review of the literature to compare union rates, time to union and complications between exchange nailing and augmentative plating as a primary procedure following a diagnosis of femoral non-union following initial nailing. We found a total of 21 papers, which found the mean union rate of augmentative plating to be 99.8% compared to 74% (P = 2.05−12) found for exchange nailing. Times to union were comparable at 5.9 months for augmentative plating and 6.3 months for exchange nailing (P = 0.68916), and complication rate was 4% for augmentative plating compared to 20% for exchange nailing. From the evidence available, plate augmentation provides a more reliable union rate if used as the first operative intervention on a non-union of a femoral fracture compared to exchange nailing. Level of Evidence IV Systematic review of therapeutic studies.


PDF Share
  1. Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr., Clawson DK (2001) Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. 1984. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(12):1912
  2. Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2007) The health economics of the treatment of long-bone non-unions. Injury 38(Suppl 2):S77-84
  3. Park J, Kim SG, Yoon HK, Yang KH (2010) The treatment of nonisthmal femoral shaft nonunions with im nail exchange versus augmentation plating. J Orthop Trauma 24(2):89-94
  4. Wu CC, Chen WJ (1997) Treatment of femoral shaft aseptic nonunions: comparison between closed and open bone-grafting techniques. J Trauma 43(1):112-116
  5. Wu CC (2007) Exchange nailing for aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft: a retrospective cohort study for effect of reaming size. J Trauma 63(4):859-865
  6. Banaszkiewicz PA, Sabboubeh A, McLeod I, Maffulli N (2003) Femoral exchange nailing for aseptic non-union: not the end to all problems. Injury 34(5):349-356
  7. Furlong AJ, Giannoudis PV, DeBoer P, Matthews SJ, MacDonald DA, Smith RM (1999) Exchange nailing for femoral shaft aseptic non-union. Injury 30(4):245-249
  8. Shroeder JE, Mosheiff R, Khoury A, Liebergall M, Weil YA (2009) The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 23(9):653-657
  9. Swanson EA, Garrard EC, Bernstein DT, O'Connor DP, Brinker MR (2015) Results of a systematic approach to exchange nailing for the treatment of aseptic femoral nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 29(1):21-27
  10. Tsang ST, Mills LA, Baren J, Frantzias J, Keating JF, Simpson AH (2015) Exchange nailing for femoral diaphyseal fracture nonunions: risk factors for failure. Injury 46(12):2404-2409
  11. Weresh MJ, Hakanson R, Stover MD, Sims SH, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ (2000) Failure of exchange reamed intramedullary nails for ununited femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 14(5):335-338
  12. Wu CC, Shih CH, Chen WJ, Tai CL (1999) Treatment of ununited femoral shaft fractures associated with locked nail breakage: comparison between closed and open revision techniques. J Orthop Trauma 13(7):494-500
  13. Yu CW, Wu CC, Chen WJ (2002) Aseptic nonunion of a femoral shaft treated using exchange nailing. Chang Gung Med J 25(9):591-598
  14. Jiang L, Pan Z, Zheng Q (2014) Augmentation plating in hypertrophic non-union after nail fixation of femoral shaft fracture compared with exchange plating. Chin Med J (Engl) 127(16):2900-2905
  15. Chen CM, Su YP, Hung SH, Lin CL, Chiu FY (2010) Dynamic compression plate and cancellous bone graft for aseptic nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral fracture. Orthopedics 33(6):393
  16. Choi YS, Kim KS (2005) Plate augmentation leaving the nail in situ and bone grafting for non-union of femoral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 29(5):287-290
  17. Hakeos WM, Richards JE, Obremskey WT (2011) Plate fixation of femoral nonunions over an intramedullary nail with autogenous bone grafting. J Orthop Trauma 25(2):84-89
  18. Jhunjhunwala HR, Dhawale AA (2015) Is augmentation plating an effective treatment for non-union of femoral shaft fractures with nail in situ? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Apr:29
  19. Lin CJ, Chiang CC, Wu PK, Chen CF, Huang CK, Su AW et al (2012) Effectiveness of plate augmentation for femoral shaft nonunion after nailing. J Chin Med Assoc 75(8):396-401
  20. Nadkarni B, Srivastav S, Mittal V, Agarwal S (2008) Use of locking compression plates for long bone nonunions without removing existing intramedullary nail: review of literature and our experience. J Trauma-Inj Infect Crit Care 65(2):482-486
  21. Said GZ, Said HG, El-Sharkawi MM (2011) Failed intramedullary nailing of femur: open reduction and plate augmentation with the nail in situ. Int Orthop 35(7):1089-1092
  22. Ueng SW, Chao EK, Lee SS, Shih CH (1997) Augmentative plate fixation for the management of femoral nonunion after intramedullary nailing. J Trauma 43(4):640-644
  23. Ye J, Zheng Q (2012) Augmentative locking compression plate fixation for the management of long bone nonunion after intramedullary nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(7):937-940
  24. Park K, Kim K, Choi YS (2011) Comparison of mechanical rigidity between plate augmentation leaving the nail in situ and interlocking nail using cadaveric fracture model of the femur. Int Orthop 35(4):581-585
  25. Ma X, Wang M, Zhang B, Wang Z, Lang Y, Gong X (2015) Antirotational plates with intramedullary nailing stabilize femoral shaft fracture nonunion: a biomechanical study. Int J Surg Res Pract 2(2):2-3
  26. Park J, Yang KH (2013) Indications and outcomes of augmentation plating with decortication and autogenous bone grafting for femoral shaft nonunions. Injury 44(12):1820-1825
  27. Pihlajamaki HK, Salminen ST, Bostman OM (2002) The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16(6):394-402
  28. Wu CC (1997) The effect of dynamization on slowing the healing of femur shaft fractures after interlocking nailing. J Trauma 43(2):263-267
  29. Wu CC, Chen WJ (1997) Healing of 56 segmental femoral shaft fractures after locked nailing. Poor results of dynamization. Acta Orthop Scand 68(6):537-540
  30. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Sanders RA, Quintero J, Santoro VM, Ganz R et al (1997) Complex nonunion of fractures of the femoral shaft treated by wave-plate osteosynthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(2):289-294
  31. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting item for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(6):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.