Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 1 ( April, 2018 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Bridging hard callus at 48 days in an open femoral shaft fracture with segmental defect treated with a first-stage Masquelet technique: I wasn't expecting that

Andrew James Hotchen, Lynne V. Barr

Keywords : Masquelet procedure, Traumatic brain injury, Segmental defect

Citation Information : Hotchen AJ, Barr LV. Bridging hard callus at 48 days in an open femoral shaft fracture with segmental defect treated with a first-stage Masquelet technique: I wasn't expecting that. 2018; 13 (1):57-60.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-017-0300-z

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

The Masquelet technique is a strategy for management of segmental bone defects. It is a two-stage procedure that involves inducing a synovial-like membrane that can be used for a bone graft. Segmental bone defects can occur following trauma and can accompany traumatic brain injury. There is a well-documented, albeit debated, association between traumatic brain injury and increased rate of new bone formation. Here, we present a case of unexpected callus formation in a segmental femoral fracture. The patient had a traumatic brain injury and was treated with the first stage of the Masquelet technique. Owing to the amount of large callus, a second stage of the Masquelet was not required. The patient recovered well from the injury and at 16-week follow-up was able to partially weight bear. A case similar to this has not previously been reported within the literature.


PDF Share
  1. Calandriello B (1964) Callus formation in severe brain injuries. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 25:170-175
  2. Tsitsilonis S et al (2015) The effect of traumatic brain injury on bone healing: an experimental study in a novel in vivo animal model. Injury 46(4):661-665
  3. Giannoudis PV et al (2006) Accelerated bone healing and excessive callus formation in patients with femoral fracture and head injury. Injury 37 Suppl 3(3):S18-S24
  4. Huang W et al (2012) Does traumatic brain injury result in accelerated mandibular fracture healing? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(9):2135-2142
  5. Bose D et al (2015) Management of infected nonunion of the long bones by a multidisciplinary team. Bone Joint J 97-B(6):814-817
  6. Masquelet AC et al (2000) Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 45(3):346-353
  7. Masquelet AC, Begue T (2010) The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am 41(1):27-37
  8. Assal M, Stern R (2014) The masquelet procedure gone awry. Orthopedics 37(11):e1045-e1048
  9. Kon T et al (2001) Expression of osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of NF-êB ligand (osteoprotegerin ligand) and related proinflammatory cytokines during fracture healing. J Bone Miner Res 16(6):1004-1014
  10. Kossmann T et al (1996) Interleukin-6 released in human cerebrospinal fluid following traumatic brain injury may trigger nerve growth factor production in astrocytes. Brain Res 713(1-2):143-152
  11. Kossmann T et al (1995) Intrathecal and serum interleukin-6 and the acute-phase response in patients with severe traumatic brain injuries. Shock (Augusta, Ga) 4(5):311-317
  12. Barry F, Murphy M (2013) Mesenchymal stem cells in joint disease and repair. Nat Rev Rheumatol 9(10):584-594
  13. Hammonds RG et al (1991) Bone-inducing activity of mature BMP-2b produced from a hybrid BMP-2a/2b precursor. Mol Endocrinol (Baltimore, Md) 5(1):149-155
  14. Boes M et al (2006) Osteogenic effects of traumatic brain injury on experimental fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(4):738-743
  15. Wei Y et al (2008) Elevated leptin expression in a rat model of fracture and traumatic brain injury. J Pharm Pharmacol 60(12):1667-1672
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.