Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( August, 2017 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Can experienced surgeons predict the additional value of a CT scan in patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures?

Y. V. Kleinlugtenbelt, K. Madden, S. R. Groen, S. J. Ham, Peter Kloen, R. Haverlag, M. P. Simons, Mohit Bhandari, J. C. Goslings, V. A. B. Scholtes, R. W. Poolman

Keywords : Distal radius fractures, CT scans, Clinical decision making

Citation Information : Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Madden K, Groen SR, Ham SJ, Kloen P, Haverlag R, Simons MP, Bhandari M, Goslings JC, Scholtes VA, Poolman RW. Can experienced surgeons predict the additional value of a CT scan in patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures?. 2017; 12 (2):91-97.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-017-0283-9

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 31-08-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

There are no clear guidelines when an additional CT scan should be obtained for the treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRF). This study aimed to investigate whether surgeons can predict the usefulness of CT scans to facilitate choice of treatment plan and/or pre-operative planning for DRF. Four surgeons evaluated 51 patients with displaced DRF. The choice of treatment (operative or nonoperative) was based on conventional radiographs. Subsequently, the surgeons were asked whether they would have requested an additional CT scan to determine this treatment choice, and also whether they required a CT scan for pre-operative planning. After 4 weeks, the additional CT scan was provided and the cases were assessed again. Based on these data, we calculated the number needed to scan (NNS) and number needed to harm (NNH) for two decision models. Model 1: Only provide a CT scan if the surgeon requested one based on their judgment of the X-rays. Model 2: CT scans for all displaced intra-articular DRF. For choice of treatment, the NNS was lower for model 1 than for model 2 (2.6 vs. 4.3) and the NNH is higher for model 1 (3.1 vs. 1.3). For pre-operative planning, the NNS (1.3 vs. 1.4) and NNH (3.7 vs. 3.4) were comparable for both models. Surgeons are able to predict the usefulness of an additional CT scan for intra-articular displaced DRF for OR indication. However, for pre-operative planning the usefulness of a CT scan is much harder to predict.


PDF Share
  1. Mendelson RM, Bairstow PJ (2010) Inappropriate imaging: why it matters, why it happens, what can be done. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54:173-177
  2. Amis ES, Butler PF, American College of Radiology (2010) ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: three years later. J Am Coll Radiol 7:865-870
  3. Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD (2010) Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998-2007. JAMA 304:1465-1471
  4. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Goske MJ, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995-2008. Radiology 259:793-801
  5. das Gracas Nascimento V, da Costa AC, Falcochio DF, Lanzarin LD, Checchia SL, Chakkour I (2015) Computed tomography's influence on the classifications and treatment of the distal radius fractures. Hand (N Y) 10:663-669
  6. Cole RJ, Bindra RR, Evanoff BA, Gilula LA, Yamaguchi K, Gelberman RH (1997) Radiographic evaluation of osseous displacement following intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: reliability of plain radiography versus computed tomography. J Hand Surg Am 22:792-800
  7. Dahlen HC, Franck WM, Sabauri G, Amlang M, Zwipp H (2004) Incorrect classification of extra-articular distal radius fractures by conventional X-rays. Comparison between biplanar radiologic diagnostics and CT assessment of fracture morphology. Unfallchirurg 107:491-498. doi:10.1007/s00113-004-0747-5
  8. Harness NG, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Harris GJ, Jupiter JB (2006) The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions on the characterization and treatment of distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1315-1323. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00686
  9. Johnston GH, Friedman L, Kriegler JC (1992) Computerized tomographic evaluation of acute distal radial fractures. J Hand Surg Am 17:738-744
  10. Pruitt DL, Gilula LA, Manske PR, Vannier MW (1994) Computed tomography scanning with image reconstruction in evaluation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 19:720-727. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90174-0
  11. Hunt JJ, Lumsdaine W, Attia J, Balogh ZJ (2013) AO type-C distal radius fractures: the influence of computed tomography on surgeon's decision-making. ANZ J Surg 83:676-678. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06311.x;10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06311.x
  12. Murray J, Gross L (2013) Treatment of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:502-505
  13. Cole RJ, Bindra RR, Evanoff BA, Gilula LA, Yamaguchi K, Gelberman RH (1997) Radiographic evaluation of osseous displacement following intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: reliability of plain radiography versus computed tomography. J Hand Surg Am 22:792-800
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.