Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( August, 2014 ) > List of Articles


Preliminary experience with motorized distraction for tibial lengthening

Adam S. Bright, John E. Herzenberg, Dror Paley, Ian Weiner, Rolf D. Burghardt

Keywords : Bone lengthening, Limb length discrepancy, Ilizarov, External fixator, Motorized distraction, Distraction osteogenesis, Tibia

Citation Information : Bright AS, Herzenberg JE, Paley D, Weiner I, Burghardt RD. Preliminary experience with motorized distraction for tibial lengthening. 2014; 9 (2):97-100.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-014-0191-1

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).


Limb lengthening by callus distraction is commonly performed with the use of external fixation. Lengthening is routinely performed by the patient through small increments throughout the course of a day. Ilizarov has shown that both the rate and frequency of distraction are important factors in the quality of osteogenesis. We report the effect of motorized high frequency distraction for tibial lengthening in comparison with manual low-frequency distraction at the same rate. Manual distraction (0.25 mm four times a day) in a group containing 43 tibiae was compared with motorized distraction (1/1,440 mm 1,400 times a day) in a group containing 27 tibiae. There was no significant difference in time to union or in the incidence of complications.

PDF Share
  1. Ilizarov GA (1998) The transosseous osteosynthesis: theoretical and clinical aspects of the regeneration and growth of tissue. Springer, New York
  2. Ilizarov GA (1989) The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: part 11: the influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239:263-285
  3. Korzinek K, Tepic S, Perren SM (1990) Histogenesis during bone lengthening. In: XVIII world congress of SICOT meeting, Montreal
  4. Welch RD, Birch JG, Makarov MR, Samchukov ML (1998) Histomorphometry of distraction osteogenesis in a caprine tibial lengthening model. J Bone Miner Res 13(1):1-9
  5. Kreitz G, Wieling R, Tepic S, et al (1995) Distraction osteogenesis in long bones with external fixation: comparative animal study of continuous versus intermittent distraction. In: 5th annual scientific meeting of AS AMI North America, Orlando
  6. Wiltfang J, Kessler P, Merten HA, Neukam FW (2001) Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(1):2-7
  7. Weiner I, Paley D, Suter C, Fischgrund J (1994) Comparison of percutaneous osteotome versus Gigli saw osteotomies for tibial lengthenings. In: 6 1st annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans
  8. Fischgrund J, Paley D, Suter C (1994) Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301(3):1-37
  9. Makarov MR, Kochutina LN, Samchukov ML, Birch JG, Welch RD (2001) Effect of rhythm and level of distraction on muscle structure: an animal study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:250-264
  10. Nakamura E, Mizuta H, Sei A, Takagi K (1993) Knee articular cartilage injury in leg lengthening: histological studies in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 64:437-440
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.