Citation Information :
French JM, Filer J, Hogan K, Fletcher JW, Mitchell S. Computer Hexapod-assisted Orthopaedic Surgery for the Correction of Multiplanar Deformities throughout the Lower Limb. 2024; 19 (1):9-14.
Introduction: Computerised hexapod-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS) is a method by which complex multiplanar, multilevel deformity can be corrected with a high degree of accuracy utilising minimally invasive techniques within a single operative event. This study's aim was to report the reliability, accuracy and magnitude of correction achieved, alongside patient-reported outcomes and risk factors for complications when using the CHAOS technique throughout the lower limb.
Materials and methods: Retrospective review of medical records and radiographs for consecutive patients who underwent CHAOS for lower limb deformity correction at a tertiary centre between 2012 and 2020.
Results: There were 70 cases in 56 patients, with the site of surgery being the femur in 48 cases, proximal tibia in 17 and distal tibia in 5 cases. Multiplanar correction was performed in 43 cases, and multilevel osteotomy was undertaken in 23 cases. Fixation was undertaken with intramedullary nailing (IMN) in 49 cases and locked plates in 21.
The maximum corrections were 40° rotation, 20° coronal angulation, 51° sagittal angulation and 62-mm mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Deformity correction was mechanically satisfactory in all patients bar one who was undercorrected requiring revision. The mean patient global impression of change (PGIC) score was 6.2 out of 7.
Overall complication rate was 12/70 (17%). Complications from femoral surgery included two nonunions, one case of undercorrection, one case of stiffness, one muscle hernia and one pulmonary embolism. Complications from tibial surgery were one compartment syndrome, one pseudoaneurysm of the anterior tibial artery requiring stenting, one transient neurapraxia of the common peroneal nerve, one locking plate fatigue failure, one seroma and one superficial wound infection.
Conclusion: Computerised hexapod-assisted orthopaedic surgery can be used for accurate correction of complex multilevel and multiplanar deformities of both the femur and tibia. The risk profile appears to differ between femoral and tibial surgeries, and also to that of traditional circular frame correction. Patients remain highly satisfied with both the functional and symptomatic outcomes.
Vincent KR, Conrad BP, Fregly BJ, et al. The pathophysiology of osteoarthritis: A mechanical perspective on the knee joint. PM R 2012;4(Suppl. 5):S3–S9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.01.020.
Gubin AV, Borzunov DY, Malkova TA. The Ilizarov paradigm: Thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research. Int Orthop 2013;37(8):1533–1539. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013- 1935-0.
Rozbruch SR, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov S. Correction of tibial deformity with use of the Ilizarov–Taylor spatial frame. JBJS 2006;88(Suppl. 4):156–174. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00745.
Abulaiti A, Yilihamu Y, Yasheng T, et al. The psychological impact of external fixation using the Ilizarov or Orthofix LRS method to treat tibial osteomyelitis with a bone defect. Injury 2017;48(12):2842–2846. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.036.
Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clini Orthop Relat 1990;250:81–104. PMID: 2403498.
Rogers MJ, McFadyen I, Livingstone JA, et al. Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS) in the correction of long bone fracture and deformity. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21(5):337–342. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180463103.
Hughes A, Heidari N, Mitchell S, et al. Computer hexapod-assisted orthopaedic surgery provides a predictable and safe method of femoral deformity correction. Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(2):283–288. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0271.R1.
Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004;27(1):26–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.11.003.
Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. Heidelberg: Springer; 2002, p. 806.
Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, et al. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthopedic Clin North Am 1994;25(3):425–466.
De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi–Brivio L, et al. Limb lengthening by callus distraction (callotasis). J Pediatr Orthop 1987;7(2):129–134. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-198703000-00002.
Rozbruch SR, Segal K, Ilizarov S, et al. Does the Taylor spatial frame accurately correct tibial deformities? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(5):1352–1361. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1161-7.
Feldman DS, Shin SS, Madan S, et al. Correction of tibial malunion and nonunion with six-axis analysis deformity correction using the taylor spatial frame. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17(8):549–454. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200309000-00002.
Pesenti S, Iobst CA, Launay F. Evaluation of the external fixator TrueLok Hexapod System for tibial deformity correction in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103(5):761–764. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.015.
Gigi R, Gortzak Y, Moreno JB, et al. 3D-printed cutting guides for lower limb deformity correction in the young population. J Pediatr Orthop 2022;42(5):e427–e434. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002104.
Materialise UK. Patient-specific osteotomy guides. 2022. Available at: https://www.materialise.com/en/medical/personalized-guides/patient-specific-osteotomy-guides. Accessed on: 26 August 2022.
Dobbe JGG, du Pré KJ, Kloen P, et al. Computer-assisted and patient-specific 3-D planning and evaluation of a single-cut rotational osteotomy for complex long-bone deformities. Med Biol Eng Comput 2011;49(12):1363–1370. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0830-3.
