Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Free Fibula Flap in Traumatic Femoral Bone Reconstruction: A 10-year Review

Sebastien Viaud-Ambrosino, Jean-Baptiste de Villeneuve Bargemon, Najib Kachouh, Andre Gay, Alice Mayoly, Regis Legre, Charlotte Jaloux, Caroline Curvale

Keywords : Bone reconstruction, Femoral reconstruction, Free fibula flap, Loss of bone substance

Citation Information : Viaud-Ambrosino S, Bargemon JD, Kachouh N, Gay A, Mayoly A, Legre R, Jaloux C, Curvale C. Free Fibula Flap in Traumatic Femoral Bone Reconstruction: A 10-year Review. 2023; 18 (1):44-50.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1575

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 31-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Introduction: The loss of femoral bone substance represents a major therapeutic issue. When the loss of bone substance is extensive, or the local condition is unfavourable, there are few satisfactory solutions. In this study, we share our experience of large femoral bone reconstruction by free fibula flap. Materials and methods: A retrospective monocentric chart review (2007–2017) was performed for 26 patients after receiving a pure bone-free fibula flap operation. The times of consolidation and hypertrophy of the graft were analysed according to the fixation with a 2-year follow-up. Results: The time to consolidation was 8.7 months (range, 6–15) for double plates, 7.2 months (range, 5–11) for locked plates, 6 months (range, 5–7) for external fixators and plate blades and 8 months (range, 7–9) for intramedullary nails. Full weight-bearing was resumed at an average of 6.5 months (range, 5–10) postoperatively. It was authorised at 7 months (range, 5–10) for patients fixed by double plate, at 6.3 months (range, 5–9) for those fixed by a locked plate, at 5.5 months (range, 5–6) for those fixed by an external fixator or plate blade and at 7 months for those fixed by an intramedullary nail. Conclusion: Free fibula flap remains reliable in the face of a great loss of bone material after trauma, with high consolidation rates. The choice of fixation must be reasoned and should offer a compromise between stability, allowing consolidation and hypertrophy of the graft, and rigidity, exposing the risk of massive osteosynthesis dismantling. Other multicentric studies, including more patients, should be carried out to compare the techniques of fixation.

  1. Taylor GI, Miller GDH, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft: A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plastic Reconstr Surg 1975;55(5):533–544. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197505000-00002.
  2. Lhowe DW, Hansen ST. Immediate nailing of open fractures of the femoral shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70(6):812–820. PMID: 3292534.
  3. Judet H, Gilbert A, Mathoulin C, et al. Reconstruction of loss of bony substance in limbs by free vascularized fibula transplant. Chirurgie 1991;117(5–6):469–476. PMID: 1817847.
  4. Mathoulin C, Gilbert A, Judet H, et al. Free transfer of the vascularized fibula in pseudarthrosis and femoral bone loss. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1993;79(6):492–499. PMID: 8066301.
  5. Wood MB. Free vascularized fibular grafting—25 years’ experience: Tips, techniques, and pearls. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2006.10.007.
  6. Banic A, Hertel R. Double vascularized fibulas for reconstruction of large tibial defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 1993;9(6):421–428. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1006751.
  7. Coulet B, Pflieger JF, Arnaud S, et al. Double-barrel fibular graft for metaphyseal areas reconstruction around the knee. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96(8):868–875. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.011.
  8. Dautel G, Duteille F, Merle M. Use of osteocutaneous “double-barrel fibular flaps” in limb reconstruction: Four clinical cases. Microsurgery 2001;21(7):340–344. DOI: 10.1002/micr.1062.
  9. He Y, Zhang ZY, Zhu HG, et al. Double-barrel fibula vascularized free flap with dental rehabilitation for mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69(10):2663–2669. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.051.
  10. Bakri K, Stans AA, Mardini S, et al. Combined massive allograft and intramedullary vascularized fibula transfer: The capanna technique for lower-limb reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2008;22(3):234–241. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1081406.
  11. Feltri P, Solaro L, Errani C, et al. Vascularized fibular grafts for the treatment of long bone defects: Pros and cons. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;143(1):29–48. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03962-5.
  12. Beris AE, Lykissas MG, Korompilias AV, et al. Vascularized fibula transfer for lower limb reconstruction. Microsurgery 2011;31(3):205–211. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20841.
  13. Crane H, Boam G, Carradice D, et al. Through-knee versus above-knee amputation for vascular and non-vascular major lower limb amputations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;12(12):CD013839. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013839.pub2.
  14. Böhle S, Rohe S, Kirschberg J, et al. Poor outcome of above-knee amputation after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2022;35(6):645–652. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716416.
  15. Stafford PR, Norris BL. Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: A review of 25 cases. Injury 2010;41(Suppl 2):S72–S77. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(10)70014-0.
  16. Newman JT, Stahel PF, Smith WR, et al. A new minimally invasive technique for large volume bone graft harvest for treatment of fracture nonunions. Orthopedics 2008;31(3):257–261. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20080301-29.
  17. Jones NF, Swartz WM, Mears DC, et al. The “double barrel” free vascularized fibular bone graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81(3): 378–385. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198803000-00011.
  18. Taupin A, Soubeyrand E, Dugué A, et al. Lambeau libre de péroné en « double barre » et risque vasculaire. Enquête nationale. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillo-fac 2011;112(6):333–336. DOI: 10.1016/j.stomax.2011.08.011.
  19. Zheng-gang B, Xin-guang H, Chun-jiang F, et al. Reconstruction of large limb bone defects with a double-barrel free vascularized fibular graft. Chin Med J 2008;121(23):2424–2428. PMID: 19102962.
  20. Chew WY, Low CK, Tan SK. Long-term results of free vascularized fibular graft. A clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;(311):258–261. PMID: 7634583.
  21. Doi K, Kawakami F, Hiura Y, et al. One-stage treatment of infected bone defects of the tibia with skin loss by free vascularized osteocutaneous grafts. Microsurgery 1995;16(10):704–712. DOI: 10.1002/micr.1920161009.
  22. Pelissier P, Boireau P, Martin D, et al. Bone reconstruction of the lower extremity: Complications and outcomes. Plastic Reconstr Surg 2003;111(7):2223–2229. DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000060116.21049.53.
  23. El-Sayed M, El-Hadidi M, El-Adl W. Free non-vascularised fibular graft for treatment of post-traumatic bone defects. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73(1):70–76. PMID: 17441661.
  24. Arai K, Toh S, Tsubo K, et al. Complications of vascularized fibula graft for reconstruction of long bones. Plastic Reconstr Surg 2002;109(7):2301–2306. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00021.
  25. Lee KS, Han SB, Baek JR. Free vascularized osteocutaneous fibular graft to the tibia in 51 consecutive cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004;20(4):277–284. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-824884.
  26. Cavadas PC, Landín L, Ibáñez J, et al. Reconstruction of major traumatic segmental bone defects of the Tibia with vascularized bone transfers. Plastic Reconstr Surg 2010;125(1):215–223. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c495b3.
  27. Tu YK, Yen CY, Yeh WL, et al. Reconstruction of posttraumatic long bone defect with free vascularized bone graft: Good outcome in 48 patients with 6 years’ follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72(4): 359–364. DOI: 10.1080/000164701753542014.
  28. Han CS, Wood MB, Bishop AT, et al. Vascularized bone transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74(10):1441–1449. PMID: 1469003
  29. Mattar R, Azze RJ, Ferreira MC, et al. Vascularized fibular graft for management of severe osteomyelitis of the upper extremity. Microsurgery 1994;15(1):22–27. DOI: 10.1002/micr.1920150108.
  30. de Boer HH, Wood MB. Bone changes in the vascularised fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71(3):374–378. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B3.2722923.
  31. Bos KE, Besselaar PP, vd Eijken LW, et al. Failure of hypertrophy in revascularised fibula grafts due to stress protection. Microsurgery 1996;17(7):366–370. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1996)17:7<366::AID-MICR4>3.0.CO;2-E.
  32. Chen CM, Disa JJ, Lee HY, et al. Reconstruction of extremity long bone defects after sarcoma resection with vascularized fibula flaps: A 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119(3):915–924. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252306.72483.9b.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.