Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

High Tibial Osteotomy for Genu Varum in Adults: Do Proprietary Implants Limit the Quality of Correction?

LN Solomin, DV Chugaev, AV Filippova, PN Kulesh

Citation Information : Solomin L, Chugaev D, Filippova A, Kulesh P. High Tibial Osteotomy for Genu Varum in Adults: Do Proprietary Implants Limit the Quality of Correction?. 2020; 15 (1):13-22.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1449

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 27-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


The surgical technique of proximal tibial osteotomy for genu varum in adults has evolved from a procedure using closing wedges of estimated sizes with staple fixation in the 1960s to using standard trauma internal fixation implants and, more recently, to gradual correction with software-guided hexapod external fixators. In the last two decades, implant manufacturers have also produced anatomical implants specific for such corrective osteotomies. This study evaluates the limits of using such proprietary implants for proximal tibial osteotomy in genu varum. Materials and methods: Scanograms (teleradiograms) of lower limbs of a patient were used to derive skiagrams (two-dimensional bony outlines of the extremities). From these, two-dimensional and three-dimensional models of varus deformities of the tibia with different values of mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA, from 85° to 40°) were created. An analysis of the created deformity was carried out and a simulation for surgical correction was performed using an open wedge high tibial osteotomy with fixation using a proprietary (Tomofix, Synthes) implant. In addition, a 3D simulation technique was used to check the accuracy of the results obtained from the 2D simulation. Results: • In cases of mMPTA ≥80° with localisation of the apex of varus deformity at the level of the knee joint line, the standard technique used with the proprietary medial tibial plate produces good results. • In cases of mMPTA ≤70°, fixation of the osteotomised fragments by the proprietary medial plate is poor owing to the anatomical contours of the implant. In these cases, a different type of osteosynthesis is needed. • In cases of mMPTA ≤70°, the distance between the lower edge of the bone plate and the medial surface of the tibia after a proximal tibial osteotomy exceeds 11 mm and will result in unacceptable soft tissue tension around the implant. • Mechanical axis deviation to the Fujisawa point produces mMPTA values outside the reference range of normal values. Conclusion: An osteotomy of the proximal tibia using a prescribed technique linked to a proprietary implant achieves good results only if performed within a certain range of deformity values. Pronounced varus deformities require a fundamentally different approach. This study reveals that surgeons undertaking corrective proximal tibial osteotomies for genu varum need to perform a comprehensive analysis of the deformity to allow for appropriate selection of patients. This will enable a consideration of the size and other characteristics of the deformity that will reduce the technical complications that may arise if the correction was performed using the recommended technique linked to a proprietary implant.

  1. Jackson JP, Waugh W. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961;43-B(4):746–751. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.43B4.746.
  2. Jackson JP, Waugh W, Green JP. High tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1969;51(1):88–94.
  3. Liang G, Madry H, Chugaev D, et al. Advances in modern osteotomies around the knee. J Exp Orthop 2019;6(1):9. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-019-0177-5.
  4. Gebhard F, Krettek C, Hüfner T, et al. Reliability of computer-assisted surgery as an intraoperative ruler in navigated high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131(3):297–302. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1145-9.
  5. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1979;10(3): 585–608.
  6. Lobenhoffer P. Stellenwert der knienahen osteotomie bei medialer gonarthrose. Orthopäde 2014;43(5):425–431. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-013-2189-7.
  7. Pérez-Mañanes R, Burró JA, Manaute JR, et al. 3D surgical printing cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: do it yourself. J Knee Surg 2016;29(8):690–695. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572412.
  8. Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, et al. Tomofix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia–early results in 92 cases. Injury 2003;34(2):B55–B62. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003. 09.025.
  9. Harris WR, Kostuik JP. High tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52(2):330–336. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197052020-00014.
  10. Insall JN. High tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Surg Annu 1975;7:347–359.
  11. Salenius P, Kivilaakso R. High tibial osteotomy with Charnley's compression device. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn 1970;59(1):42–45.
  12. Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O. I can't get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):148–152. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32767.
  13. Kulyaba TA, Kornilov NN. Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Saint-Petersburg 2016. p. 192.
  14. Hofmann S, Lobenhoffer P, Staubli A, et al. Osteotomies around the knee. European Instructional Lectures. Copenhagen, Denmark: EFORT Congress; 2011. pp. 177–189.
  15. Gorecki P, Gorecki W. Jan Mikulicz-Radecki (1850-1905) – the creator of modern European surgery. Dig Surg 2002;19(4):313–318. DOI: 10.1159/000064574.
  16. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, et al. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 1994;25(3):425–465.
  17. Paley D. Principles of deformity correction Holly L, Anderson P, ed. Essentials of Spinal Stabilization. Springer, Cham; 2017. pp. 487–504.
  18. Barksfield RC, Monsell FP. Predicting translational deformity following opening-wedge osteotomy for lower limb realignment. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2015;10(3):167–173. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-015-0232-4.
  19. Whitaker AT, Gesheff MG, Jauregui JJ, et al. Comparison of PACS and bone ninja mobile application for assessment of lower extremity limb length discrepancy and alignment. J Child Orthop 2016;10(5):439–443. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-016-0761-5.
  20. Jones GG, Jaere M, Clarke S, et al. 3D printing and high tibial osteotomy. EFORT Open Rev 2018;3(5):254–259. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170075.
  21. Kim HJ, Park J, Park KH, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of a three-dimensional printed model in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 2019;32(9):841–846. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669901.
  22. Kuriyama S, Morimoto N, Shimoto T, et al. Clinical efficacy of preoperative 3D planning for reducing surgical errors during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Res 2019;37(4):898–907. DOI: 10.1002/jor.24263.
  23. Munier M, Donnez M, Ollivier M, et al. Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103(2):245–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.020.
  24. van Egmond N, Janssen D, Hannink G, et al. Biomechanical comparison of two different locking plates for open wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Sci 2018;23(1):105–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.09.014.
  25. Kyung HS, Lee BJ, Kim JW, et al. Biplanar open wedge high tibial osteotomy in the medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee joint: comparison between the Aescula and TomoFix plate. Clin Orthop Surg 2015;7(2):185–190. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2015. 7.2.185.
  26. Takeuchi R, Woon-Hwa J, Ishikawa H, et al. Primary stability of different plate positions and the role of bone substitute in open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee 2017;24(6):1299–1306. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.015.
  27. Nakamura R, Komatsu N, Fujita K, et al. Appropriate hinge position for prevention of unstable lateral hinge fracture in open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(10):1313–1318. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0103.R1.
  28. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Akiyama H. The prevention of a lateral hinge fracture as a complication of a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a case control study. Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(7):887–893. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B7.BJJ-2016-0927.
  29. Zhang K, Wu M. Study on lateral hinge fracture during open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2019;33(1):110–114. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807049.
  30. Schröter S, Nakayama H, Yoshiya S, et al. Development of the double level osteotomy in severe varus osteoarthritis showed good outcome by preventing oblique joint line. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019;139(4):519–527. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018- 3068-9.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.