Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Fixator-assisted Percutaneous Plate Fixation of Complex Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures

Abdullah A Nada, Mohamed Romeih, Mahmoud El-Rosasy

Keywords : Comminuted fracture, External fixator, Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, Tibia

Citation Information : Nada AA, Romeih M, El-Rosasy M. Fixator-assisted Percutaneous Plate Fixation of Complex Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures. 2019; 14 (1):25-28.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1422

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of indirect reduction and fixation of comminuted diaphyseal tibial fractures using temporary simplified external fixator and plate osteosynthesis through a limited incision approach with special consideration of the duration of surgery and rate of complications. Materials and methods: In this prospective case series study, 41 cases of comminuted diaphyseal tibial fractures were included. Twenty-two were closed fractures, 15 grade I open fractures, and four were grade II open fractures. Patients were evaluated clinically according to the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS). Results: Of the 41 cases, 38 were followed up for at least 1 year. Using the LEFS, final scores ranged from 67–80 (mean 75). Union was achieved in all cases except one which united after bone grafting. The mean time to radiological healing was 12 weeks. Operative time from skin incision to closure ranged between 65 minutes and 100 minutes (mean of 80 minutes). There were four cases of superficial infection. Conclusion: Treatment of comminuted tibial fractures through use the of a simplified external fixator to aid and maintain the reduction of comminuted tibial fractures whilst limited incisions are then used for minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis in an effective and time-saving method with a low complication rate.

  1. Madadi F, Eajazi A, Madadi F, et al. Adult tibial shaft fractures – different patterns, various treatments and complications. Med Sci Monit 2011;17(11):CR640–CR645. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.882049.
  2. Güven M, Ceviz E, Demirel M, et al. Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of adult tibia fractures by means of rigid fixation with anatomic locked plates. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2013;8(2):103–109. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-013-0164-9.
  3. Rizk AS. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of high-energy tibial shaft fractures. Egypt Orthop J 2015;50(1):36–44. DOI: 10.4103/1110-1148.163124.
  4. Ali Algadiem E, Aleisa AA, Alsubaie HI. Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Mon 2016;21(2):e34131. DOI: 10.5812/traumamon.34131.
  5. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, et al. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American orthopaedic rehabilitation research network. Phys Ther 1999;79(4):371–383.
  6. Othman M, Strzelczyk P. Results of conservative treatment of pilon fractures. Ortop Traumatol Rehab 2003;5(6):787–794.
  7. Sarmiento A, Latta LL. 450 Closed fractures of the distal third of the tibia treated with a functional brace. Clin Orthop 2004(428):261–271. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137550.68318.f8.
  8. Im GI, Tae SK. Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nailversus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma 2005;59(5):1219–1223. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000188936.79798.4e.
  9. Janssen KW, Biert J, Kampen A. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop 2007;31(5):709–714. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0237-1.
  10. Bourne RB. Pylon fractures of the distal tibia. Clin Orthop 1989;240(3):42–46. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198903000-00006.
  11. Vallier HA, Le TT, Bed A. Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to theplafond): plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22(5):307–311. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816ed974.
  12. Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, et al. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury 2006;37(6):531–535. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.09. 013.
  13. Borg T, Larsson S, Lindsjo U. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Preliminary results in 21 patients. Injury 2004;35(6):608–614. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.08.015.
  14. Krackhardt T, Dilger J, Flesch I, et al. Fractures of the distal tibia treated with closed reduction and minimally invasive plating. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 2005;125(2):87–94. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0778-y.
  15. Venkata S, Lal H, Mittal D. Management of fractures of the distal third tibia by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. A prospective series of 50 patients. J Clin Orthop Trauma Elsevier Ltd and IIR 2014;5(3):129–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2014.07.010.
  16. Pintore E, Maffulli N, Petricciuolo F. Interlocking nailing for fractures of the femur and tibia. Injury 1992;23(6):381–386. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90012-H.
  17. Yin B, Chen W, Zhang Q, et al. Tibial fracture treated by minimally invasive plating using a novel low-cost, high-technique system. Int Orthop 2012;36(8):1687–1693. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1547-0.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.