Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Does the Use of Blocking Screws Improve Radiological Outcomes Following Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibia Fractures?

Ross A Fawdington, Naeil Lotfi, Alastair Beaven, Paul Fenton

Keywords : Blocking screw, Deformity, Intramedullary nailing, Poller screw, Tibia

Citation Information : Fawdington RA, Lotfi N, Beaven A, Fenton P. Does the Use of Blocking Screws Improve Radiological Outcomes Following Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibia Fractures?. 2019; 14 (1):11-14.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1418

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of blocking screws during intramedullary nailing of a distal tibia fracture improved the radiological outcome and prevented a loss of fracture alignment. As a secondary outcome, the time to radiographic union was compared to see if a more rigid bone-implant construct had an effect on healing. Methods: We searched computerized records at a UK level 1 major trauma center. The joint alignment was measured on the immediate postoperative radiograph and compared to the most recent radiograph. We used a difference of 2° to indicate a progressive deformity. Results: Thirty patients were included. Twenty patients had no blocking screw and 10 patients had a blocking screw. Six patients had a difference in their coronal plane alignment of 2° or more (3/6 had no blocking screw). The results were analyzed and found to be not statistically significant (p = 0.82). The addition of a blocking screw has also been shown not to have an effect on the time to radiological union (RUST score greater or equal to 10). Conclusion: We use a 2.5-mm blocking wire to aid in fracture reduction prior to reaming or nail insertion and then remove the wire when the nail has been adequately locked. We no longer routinely replace the wire with a blocking screw and this could lead to a decrease in procedure time, cost, and radiation exposure.

  1. Kuo LT, Chi CC, et al. Surgical interventions for treating distal tibial metaphyseal fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;30(3):CD010261. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010261.pub2.
  2. Vallier HA. Current Evidence: Plate vs Intramedullary Nail for Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures in 2016. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30(Suppl. 4):S2–S6. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000692.
  3. Mao Z, Wang G, et al. Intramedullary nailing vs plating for distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg 2015;10:95. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0217-5.
  4. Zelle BA, Bhandari M, et al. Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:76–79. DOI: 10.1097/
  5. Krettek C, Miclau T, et al. The mechanical effect of blocking screws (“Poller screws”) in stabilizing tibia fractures with short proximal or distal fragments after insertion of small-diameter intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 1999;13:550–553. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199911000-00006.
  6. Kulkarni SG, Varshneya A, et al. Intramedullary Nailing Supplemented with Poller Screws for Proximal Tibial Fractures. J Orthop Surg 2012;20:307–311. DOI: 10.1177/230949901202000308.
  7. Stinner DJ, Mir H. Techniques for Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Tibia Fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2014;45:33–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.09.001.
  8. Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin, New York: Springer, 2002.
  9. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, et al. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma 2010;68:629–632. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7c16d.
  10. Panjabi MM, Walter SD, et al. Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: a statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 1985;3:212–218. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100030211.
  11. Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT, et al. Outcome measures in orthopaedics and orthopaedic trauma, 2nd ed. London, New York: Arnold; Distributed in the United States by Oxford University Press, 2004.
  12. Puno RM, Vaughan JJ, et al. Long-term effects of tibial angular malunion on the knee and ankle joints. J Orthop Trauma 1991;5: 247–254. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199109000-00001.
  13. Canale ST, Beaty JH, et al. Campbell's operative orthopaedics, 12th ed. London: Mosby, St. Louis, Mo., 2012.
  14. Merchant TC, Dietz FR. Long-term follow-up after fractures of the tibial and fibular shafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:599–606. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198971040-00016.
  15. Krettek C, Stephan C, et al. The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Jt Surg Br 1999;81:963–968. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B6.10000.
  16. Chan DS, Nayak AN, et al. Effect of distal interlocking screw number and position after intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures: a biomechanical study simulating immediate weight-bearing. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:98–104. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000195.
  17. Van Dyke B, Colley R, et al. Effect of blocking screws on Union of Infraisthmal Femur Fractures Stabilized With a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:251–255. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001119.
  18. Moongilpatti Sengodan M, Vaidyanathan S, et al. Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures: Does Blocking Screw Extend the Indication of Intramedullary Nailing? ISRN Orthop 2014;2014:1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2014/542623.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.